“Stupid is as stupid does” is not often the description used for economics professors at Princeton; but listening to the majority of media rhetoric on where not to invest, it would appear that guilty is the verdict for Ben Bernanke. Despite being perhaps the single most influential human on earth when it comes to money, our own Helicopter Ben must be fairly dimwitted when it comes to his personal investments — or so it appears according to many pundits and “experts” in financial matters.
How could a man who earns well over $1 million annually from royalties in textbooks alone, be so ill-advised putting his own money to work? What is it that Professor Bernanke has done with his own moola that is so perplexing?
In annual reports from the central bank, the Fed Chief and its governors must report their personal investments and holdings. And would you believe that Ben Bernanke’s two largest personal investments are in fixed and variable annuities? That’s right, variable annuities (crickets chirping). It’s a fact: The most powerful financial authority owns both variable and fixed annuities as part of his retirement accounts.
GASP!? Why would Ben want to own allegedly more expensive tax-deferred vehicles inside an already tax-deferred account? Can he really be that ignorant?
Consider this: maybe it’s not all about the tax deferral benefit offered in annuities, but about the guarantees provided to retirement nest eggs. Surely, in addition to his own experience and intellect, Ben has access to extremely experienced and competent financial advisors he could bounce his investment ideas off of…
According to the FED’s annual reports, Ben owns bonds and mutual funds and other stuff; but his biggest holdings are annuities. So maybe Ben knows something the pundits and bloggers and self-proclaimed experts do not understand. Dave Ramsey is certainly not a fan of the investment product Big Ben prefers to own. Most often annuities are “perceived” to have higher cost than other types of investments and that gets the “guru’s” on radio and television to cackling. But when investing real money, It’s actually not about cost, it’s about what you earn on for your money (net, after all expenses) that matters most. Heavy hitters in the millionaire/billionaire club figured out a long time ago that it’s not what you spend, it’s what you earn; and if one cannot muster the courage to accept and manage a little risk, one is destined for personal financial Armageddon in the long run.
Annuities in general help remove the typical types of risk that scare the bejesus out of us when we invest our retirement money in IRA’s and 401k’s.
Who is truly wiser; the financial experts who write about money or the mover, shaker and policy maker? Our money is on Bernanke and other highly successful people who see the value of an institution (such as an insurance company) standing behind their investments and protecting their money from ultimate losses, whether living or dying. Who knows, maybe Ben is dumb … like a fox?
* Information and data quoted from Bloomberg: Ben Bernanke personal net worth takes a hit 7/15/11.








































Even Elvis Presley had a social security account. According to Social Security last year, people naming their babies “Elvis” dropped off the top ten most popular names list, thus ending a reign that began in 1955. Today social security is in a precarious position. Without changes immediately, it will not be able to pay out the benefits promised to Baby Boomers or Gen X. It’s not a political problem but a math problem. In 1935 when Social Security began taking F.I.C.A. with-holdings from our paycheck, the average life expectancy for a male was age 60 and age 64 for a female. Yet Social security payments didn’t begin until age 65. Today life expectancies are nearer age 83, yet Social Security begins at age 67 at the very latest. Today, Life Insurance Illustrations are ran up to age 120! (and low cost, cash value, whole life insurance may the best kept secret ever for tax free retirement income)




